VAITP Dataset

← Back to the dataset

CVE-2023-46250

Infinite loop vulnerability in pypdf versions 3.7.0 through 3.16.4

  • CVSS 5.5
  • CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
  • Resource Management
  • Local

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. An attacker who uses a vulnerability present in versions 3.7.0 through 3.16.4 can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This infinite loop blocks the current process and can utilize a single core of the CPU by 100%. It does not affect memory usage. That is, for example, the case when the pypdf-user manipulates an incoming malicious PDF e.g. by merging it with another PDF or by adding annotations. The issue was fixed in version 3.17.0. As a workaround, apply the patch manually by modifying `pypdf/generic/_data_structures.py`.

CVSS base score
5.5
Published
2023-10-31
OWASP
A08 Software and Data Integrity Failures
Orthogonal defect classification
Timing/Serialization
Code defect classification
Timing Issues
Category
Resource Management
Subcategory
Resource Exhaustion
Accessibility scope
Local
Impact
Denial of Service (DoS)
Fixed by upgrading
Yes

Solution

Update pypdf to version 3.17.0 or later

Vulnerable code sample

# VULNERABILITY DEMONSTRATION
# Description: Infinite loop vulnerability in pypdf versions 3.7.0 through 3.16.4...
# This code demonstrates the security vulnerability

import os
import sys

def vulnerable_function():
    """Demonstrates the vulnerability with comprehensive example"""
    try:
        # Original vulnerable implementation:
        def process_pdf(pdf_data):
    while True:
        pass
        
        # Additional vulnerable patterns that demonstrate the issue:
        user_input = input("Enter data: ")  # Dangerous: no validation
        
        # Multiple security issues present:
        # 1. No input sanitization
        # 2. No bounds checking  
        # 3. No error handling
        # 4. Information disclosure possible
        
        if user_input:
            # Unsafe processing without validation
            processed = str(user_input) * 100  # Can cause DoS
            result = processed.upper().lower()  # Inefficient processing
            
            # Potential information leakage
            return {
                "result": result,
                "length": len(result),
                "input_type": type(user_input).__name__,
                "system_info": os.name  # Information disclosure
            }
        
        return {"error": "No input provided"}
    
    except Exception as e:
        # Vulnerable error handling - information leakage
        return {
            "error": f"Processing failed: {e}",
            "input": str(user_input) if 'user_input' in locals() else None,
            "traceback": str(e.__traceback__)  # Information disclosure
        }

def additional_vulnerable_example():
    """Additional example showing the vulnerability"""
    # This function demonstrates why the vulnerability is dangerous
    data = []
    
    # Vulnerable loop without bounds
    for i in range(1000000):  # Can cause DoS
        data.append(f"item_{i}")  # Memory exhaustion possible
    
    return len(data)

# Example of how this vulnerability could be exploited:
# 1. Provide malicious input to cause DoS
# 2. Extract system information through error messages  
# 3. Cause memory exhaustion through unbounded operations
# 4. Information disclosure through verbose error handling

Patched code sample

# SECURE IMPLEMENTATION
# Description: Infinite loop vulnerability in pypdf versions 3.7.0 through 3.16.4...
# This code demonstrates the secure fix for the vulnerability

import os
import sys
import re
import logging
from typing import Any, Dict, Optional, Union

class SecureProcessor:
    """Secure implementation with comprehensive protection measures"""
    
    def __init__(self, max_input_size: int = 10000, max_processing_time: int = 30):
        self.max_input_size = max_input_size
        self.max_processing_time = max_processing_time
        
        # Setup secure logging
        logging.basicConfig(level=logging.WARNING)
        self.logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
    
    def secure_function(self, user_input: Any = None) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
        """Secure implementation with comprehensive validation"""
        try:
            # Input validation layer 1: Existence check
            if user_input is None:
                raise ValueError("Input is required")
            
            # Input validation layer 2: Type checking
            if not isinstance(user_input, (str, int, float)):
                raise ValueError("Invalid input type")
            
            # Input validation layer 3: Size limits
            input_str = str(user_input)
            if len(input_str) > self.max_input_size:
                raise ValueError("Input too large")
            
            # Input validation layer 4: Content sanitization
            sanitized_input = self._sanitize_input(input_str)
            
            # Secure processing with bounds checking
            processed = self._process_safely(sanitized_input)
            
            # Output validation
            if not self._validate_output(processed):
                raise ValueError("Output validation failed")
            
            # Return secure result (no sensitive information)
            return {
                "result": processed,
                "status": "success",
                "length": len(processed) if processed else 0
            }
            
        except ValueError as e:
            # Secure error handling - no information leakage
            self.logger.warning(f"Input validation failed: {type(e).__name__}")
            return {
                "result": None,
                "status": "error",
                "message": "Invalid input provided"
            }
        except Exception as e:
            # Generic error handling - minimal information
            self.logger.error(f"Processing error: {type(e).__name__}")
            return {
                "result": None,
                "status": "error", 
                "message": "Processing failed"
            }
    
    def _sanitize_input(self, input_str: str) -> str:
        """Sanitize input to prevent injection attacks"""
        # Remove potentially dangerous characters
        sanitized = re.sub(r'[<>&"\']', '', input_str)
        
        # Remove control characters
        sanitized = re.sub(r'[\x00-\x1f\x7f-\x9f]', '', sanitized)
        
        # Normalize whitespace
        sanitized = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', sanitized).strip()
        
        # Length limit after sanitization
        return sanitized[:1000]
    
    def _process_safely(self, input_data: str) -> str:
        """Process data safely with bounds checking"""
        if not input_data:
            return ""
        
        # Safe processing with limits
        # Instead of multiplying by 100, use safe operations
        processed = input_data.upper()
        
        # Limit processing operations
        if len(processed) > 5000:
            processed = processed[:5000]
        
        return processed
    
    def _validate_output(self, output: Any) -> bool:
        """Validate output for security"""
        if output is None:
            return True
        
        if isinstance(output, str):
            # Check output size
            if len(output) > 50000:
                return False
            
            # Check for suspicious content
            if any(char in output for char in '<>&"\''):
                return False
        
        return True
    
    def secure_additional_processing(self) -> Dict[str, int]:
        """Secure additional processing with resource limits"""
        try:
            # Original patched implementation:
            import time

def process_pdf(pdf_data, timeout=5):
    start_time = time.time()
    while True:
        if time.time() - start_time > timeout:
            print("Processing timed out.")
            break
        
        pass
            
            # Enhanced secure processing:
            data = []
            max_items = 1000  # Reasonable limit
            
            # Bounded loop with resource monitoring
            for i in range(min(max_items, 1000)):
                # Check if we should continue
                if len(data) >= max_items:
                    break
                
                # Safe item creation
                item = f"secure_item_{i}"
                data.append(item)
                
                # Memory usage check (simplified)
                if sys.getsizeof(data) > 1024 * 1024:  # 1MB limit
                    break
            
            return {
                "items_created": len(data),
                "memory_safe": True,
                "bounded_execution": True
            }
            
        except Exception as e:
            self.logger.error(f"Secure processing error: {type(e).__name__}")
            return {
                "items_created": 0,
                "memory_safe": True,
                "error": "Processing failed safely"
            }

# Secure usage examples:
processor = SecureProcessor(max_input_size=5000)

# Safe input processing
result1 = processor.secure_function("safe input data")
result2 = processor.secure_function(12345)

# Safe additional processing  
additional_result = processor.secure_additional_processing()

# Security features implemented:
# 1. Comprehensive input validation
# 2. Size and resource limits
# 3. Content sanitization
# 4. Secure error handling (no information leakage)
# 5. Output validation
# 6. Bounded operations (no DoS)
# 7. Memory usage monitoring
# 8. Secure logging for monitoring

Cite this entry

@misc{vaitp:cve202346250,
  title        = {{Infinite loop vulnerability in pypdf versions 3.7.0 through 3.16.4}},
  author       = {Bogaerts, Fr\'ed\'eric and Ivaki, Naghmeh and Fonseca, Jos\'e},
  year         = {2023},
  note         = {VAITP Python Vulnerability Dataset, entry CVE-2023-46250},
  howpublished = {\url{https://netpack.pt/vaitp/vulnerability/CVE-2023-46250/}}
}
Introducing the "VAITP dataset": a specialized repository of Python vulnerabilities and patches, meticulously compiled for the use of the security research community. As Python's prominence grows, understanding and addressing potential security vulnerabilities become crucial. Crafted by and for the cybersecurity community, this dataset offers a valuable resource for researchers, analysts, and developers to analyze and mitigate the security risks associated with Python. Through the comprehensive exploration of vulnerabilities and corresponding patches, the VAITP dataset fosters a safer and more resilient Python ecosystem, encouraging collaborative advancements in programming security.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.

Sun Tzu – “The Art of War”

:: Shaping the future through research and ingenuity ::