VAITP Dataset

Dataset Statistics
Search for CVE
#
CVE
Vulnerability
ODC
Category
Subcategory
Accessibility Scope
Details
Total vulnerabilities in the dataset (not showing ignored and non-python related vulnerabilties): 1612
1490
CVE-2025-62703
Insecure deserialization in Fugue's RPC server allows remote code execution.

Fugue is a unified interface for distributed computing that lets users execute Python, Pandas, and SQL code on Spark, Dask, and Ray with minimal rewrites. In version 0.9.2 and prior, there is a remote code execution vulnerability by pickle deserialization via FlaskRPCServer. The Fugue framework implements an RPC server system for distributed computing operations. In the core functionality of the RPC server implementation, I found that the _decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py directly uses cloudpickle.loads() to deserialize data without any sanitization. This creates a remote code execution vulnerability when malicious pickle data is processed by the RPC server. The vulnerability exists in the RPC communication mechanism where the client can send arbitrary serialized Python objects that will be deserialized on the server side, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine. This issue has been patched via commit 6f25326.

Timing/Serialization
Input Validation and Sanitization
Insecure Parsing or Deserialization
Remote
1489
CVE-2025-65106
LangChain prompt template injection allows access to Python internals.

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. From versions 0.3.79 and prior and 1.0.0 to 1.0.6, a template injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's prompt template system that allows attackers to access Python object internals through template syntax. This vulnerability affects applications that accept untrusted template strings (not just template variables) in ChatPromptTemplate and related prompt template classes. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.80 and 1.0.7.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Remote
1488
CVE-2025-65015
joserfc: Large JWT in error messages may cause DoS via excessive logging.

joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. In versions from 1.3.3 to before 1.3.5 and from 1.4.0 to before 1.4.2, the ExceededSizeError exception messages are embedded with non-decoded JWT token parts and may cause Python logging to record an arbitrarily large, forged JWT payload. In situations where a misconfigured โ€” or entirely absent โ€” production-grade web server sits in front of a Python web application, an attacker may be able to send arbitrarily large bearer tokens in the HTTP request headers. When this occurs, Python logging or diagnostic tools (e.g., Sentry) may end up processing extremely large log messages containing the full JWT header during the joserfc.jwt.decode() operation. The same behavior also appears when validating claims and signature payload sizes, as the library raises joserfc.errors.ExceededSizeError() with the full payload embedded in the exception message. Since the payload is already fully loaded into memory at this stage, the library cannot prevent or reject it. This issue has been patched in versions 1.3.5 and 1.4.2.

Checking
Resource Management
Resource Exhaustion
Remote
1486
CVE-2025-33184
Code injection in a Python component of Isaac-GR00T allows code execution.

NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T for all platforms contains a vulnerability in a Python component, where an attacker could cause a code injection issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Local
1485
CVE-2025-33183
Code injection in an NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T Python component allows code execution.

NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T for all platforms contains a vulnerability in a Python component, where an attacker could cause a code injection issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Local
1484
CVE-2025-63604
Code injection in execute_query via unsafe exec() allows remote code execution.

A code injection vulnerability exists in baryhuang/mcp-server-aws-resources-python 0.1.0 that allows remote code execution through insufficient input validation in the execute_query method. The vulnerability stems from the exposure of dangerous Python built-in functions (__import__, getattr, hasattr) in the execution namespace and the direct use of exec() to execute user-supplied code. An attacker can craft malicious queries to execute arbitrary Python code, leading to AWS credential theft (AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY), file system access, environment variable disclosure, and potential system compromise. The vulnerability allows attackers to bypass intended security controls and gain unauthorized access to sensitive AWS resources and credentials stored in the server's environment.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Remote
1483
CVE-2025-63603
Unauthenticated command injection in MCP Data Science Server via unsafe exec().

A command injection vulnerability exists in the MCP Data Science Server's (reading-plus-ai/mcp-server-data-exploration) 0.1.6 in the safe_eval() function (src/mcp_server_ds/server.py:108). The function uses Python's exec() to execute user-supplied scripts but fails to restrict the __builtins__ dictionary in the globals parameter. When __builtins__ is not explicitly defined, Python automatically provides access to all built-in functions including __import__, exec, eval, and open. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary Python code with full system privileges, leading to complete system compromise. The vulnerability can be exploited by submitting a malicious script to the run_script tool, requiring no authentication or special privileges.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Remote
1481
CVE-2025-64703
MaxKB < 2.3.1: Python sandbox escape in tool module leaks sensitive info.

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions prior to 2.3.1, a user can get sensitive informations by Python code in tool module, although the process run in sandbox. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Command Injection
Remote
1480
CVE-2025-64511
MaxKB sandbox bypass in the tool module allows internal network access.

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions prior to 2.3.1, a user can access internal network services such as databases through Python code in the tool module, although the process runs in a sandbox. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Remote
1477
CVE-2025-63397
Improper validation of Python sequences in OneFlow v0.9.0 causes a segfault.

Improper input validation in OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a segmentation fault via adding a Python sequence to the native code during broadcasting/type conversion.

Checking
Input Validation and Sanitization
Insecure Parsing or Deserialization
Local
Introducing the "VAITP dataset": a specialized repository of Python vulnerabilities and patches, meticulously compiled for the use of the security research community. As Python's prominence grows, understanding and addressing potential security vulnerabilities become crucial. Crafted by and for the cybersecurity community, this dataset offers a valuable resource for researchers, analysts, and developers to analyze and mitigate the security risks associated with Python. Through the comprehensive exploration of vulnerabilities and corresponding patches, the VAITP dataset fosters a safer and more resilient Python ecosystem, encouraging collaborative advancements in programming security.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.

Sun Tzu – “The Art of War”

:: Shaping the future through research and ingenuity ::